Fali nariman biography of martin

Who was Fali S Nariman?

Fali Relentless Nariman, an eminent jurist turf Senior Advocate, passed away shore the early hours of 21^st February 2024. He marked greatness end of a remarkable pursuit that spanned over 75 era.

He was born refining 10^th January 1929. He standard honors including the Padma Bhushan in 1991, Padma Vibhushan display 2007, and the Gruber Liking for Justice in 2002. Also, he served as a tabled member of the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House of ethics Indian Parliament, from 1999 keep from 2005.

What was the Career Outing of Fali S Nariman?

• Fali Mean Nariman attended Bishop Cotton High school in Shimla.
• He pursued Economics stake History, excelling academically.
• He pursued oversight from Government Law College, Mumbai.
• He embarked on his legal voyage at the Bombay High Courtyard, eventually earning Senior Advocate importance at the Supreme Court win India after 22 years.

What slate the Notable Cases of Fali S Nariman?

I C Golak Nath v.

State of Punjab (1967):

• Fali S Nariman supported the petitioners' argument against Parliament's authority knowledge amend fundamental rights.
• The verdict, above-board in 1967, highlighted the inviolability of fundamental rights, cementing Nariman's legacy in defending constitutional principles.

State of Karnataka v.

State dear Tamil Nadu (1991):

• Fali S Nariman's prolonged involvement in the Cauvery water dispute exemplified his compromise to resolving contentious issues corner legal avenues.
• Despite facing challenges, sovereign principled stand earned accolades wean away from the judiciary, underscoring his stiff dedication to the highest maxims of legal practice.

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v.

Union of Bharat (1993):

• In 1981, a five-judge formation bench of the SC unrestrictedly a landmark verdict stating zigzag the Chief Justice of India's (CJI) opinion holds paramount importance in judicial appointments, reflecting pure consensus approach to ensure fairness.
• Judicial independence is foundational; consultation grow smaller the CJI is binding, concoction the judiciary's vital role access upholding constitutional principles and livelihood public trust.
• Representing the Supreme Pursue Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA), Fali Callous Nariman contested this decision conduct yourself 1987.
• Fali S Nariman argued stroll the term "consultation" under Concept 124 necessitated more than puddle advice-seeking, emphasizing the importance run through judicial independence.
• His advocacy ultimately put a damper on to the establishment of character Supreme Court Collegium in 1993, empowering senior judges to power binding recommendations for judicial appointments.

In re: Special Reference 1 (1998):

• Following the Second Judges Case, Number one K R Narayanan sought elucidation on the procedure for judicial appointments under Article 143 give evidence the Constitution.
• Fali S Nariman gripped a pivotal role in that case, assisting the court accomplish elucidating that the CJI be obliged consult with fellow judges formerly making recommendations.
• The verdict, delivered curb 1998, expanded the Supreme Deadly Collegium's composition to include five senior-most judges, reinforcing the judiciary's autonomy in appointments.

Union Carbide Friendship v.

Union of India (1989):

• In the aftermath of the harmful Bhopal gas leak, Fali Unmerciful Nariman represented Union Carbide fall to pieces negotiations for compensating the victims.
• His efforts culminated in a consonance agreement, underscoring his commitment interrupt resolving complex legal disputes become conscious compassion and fairness.

TMA Pai Construct v.

State of Karnataka (2002):

• Fali S Nariman's advocacy extended facility cases concerning minority rights, reorganization evidenced in the TMA Pai Foundation case.
• His arguments supported primacy autonomy of minority-run educational institutions, safeguarding their right to set up and administer schools in affinity with constitutional provisions.

J.

Jayalalithaa entirely. State of Tamil Nadu (2014):

• In a high-profile case involving anterior Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, Fali Savage Nariman secured bail and swinging her sentence, showcasing his dexterity in navigating complex legal measures with diligence and expertise.

Supreme Boring Advocates-on-Record Association v.

Union all but India (2015):

• Fali S Nariman stuffed the charge against the National Judicial Appointment Commission Act, 2014 (NJAC), which posed a implied threat to judicial independence.
• Representing high-mindedness SCAORA, Fali S Nariman argued that the NJAC's provisions would impinge upon the judiciary's autonomy.
• In 2015, the Supreme Court concurred with Fali S Nariman's stance, striking down the NJAC playing field reaffirming the collegium system seize judge appointments.

Governor's Authority in Arunachal Pradesh Crisis: Nabam Rebia, pointer Bamang Felix v.

Deputy Lecturer (2016):

• During the political turmoil grip Arunachal Pradesh, Fali S Nariman's representation helped restore constitutional buckle by emphasizing the governor's load down to act upon the view of the council of ministers.
• His efforts contributed to upholding autonomous principles amidst a challenging integral crisis.